Arguing With Thermometers

have to say that i was expecting something slightly better. the dub drop doesnt seem enforced enough.

Sick vocals though. Stoked to hear the rest.

I'm in love. Definitely surpassed my expectations. Can't wait to hear it on my big speaker set tomorrow!

Needs some listen to ween my ears off the bbc session. There's parts in that sound a bit more fluid at the moment. Chorus sound BIG though.

I'm just picturing some really crunchy saxophone during the "That's the sound of another door shutting in" parts. Sounds so fitting.

ChumbaWumba wrote:

Skully wrote:have to say that i was expecting something slightly better. the dub drop doesnt seem enforced enough. Sick vocals though. Stoked to hear the rest.

Exact opposite to how I felt hahaha. Was really digging the dub drop but thought Rou's vocals weren't as powerful as he does them live. After a few more listens thought i'm really digging them now though.

I think the inwards he was doing live sounded stronger, but inwards can easily be over done.

I thought it was incredible. The studio version is so much better than I thought it would be actually, I thought it was just going to sound like a cleaner version of the live session. Cannot fucking wait for the rest of the album now.

Go fuck yourself, San Diego!

I kinda hate when bands release demos/live versions, you get kinda used to that version and cant help but compare it (normally always goes away). anyways, I love how the verses came out, much more upbeat then the bbc version. the chorus im not quite sure about yet. I was hoping for the bass to be ridiculous, but it sounds rather toned down.. slightly disapointed by that. Although, youtube at 720p still isnt amazing, maybe the acutal cd will have a bit more

When the 320s come out played through decent headphones or speakers I think it will come to life.

Listened to on my studio headphones. They sub-bass is VERY low. Probably why it sound weak on standard speakers or ipod headphones.

http://www.facebook.com/Phillis.McCleavland

Get liking, get ahead of the crowd and be all hipsterish

Dodson wrote:http://www.facebook.com/Phillis.McCleavland

Get liking, get ahead of the crowd and be all hipsterish

That is shocking.

Pete wrote:Listened to on my studio headphones. They sub-bass is VERY low. Probably why it sound weak on standard speakers or ipod headphones.

its not so much the sub, just the bass sounded much more punchy and prominent in the bbc version. seems a little more in the background in the studio version

beth wrote:
Go fuck yourself, San Diego!

Holy fuck he does look like Alan Statham.

joebarnes wrote:When the 320s come out played through decent headphones or speakers I think it will come to life.

It's all about the v0 or FLAC

2:20 - 2:45 is so ridiculous. Listen into the left channel. Who hears a "fuck youuuu" right when it hits?

I don't think there is anything wrong with the bass. I just think the bass isn't "dirty" enough to your dubstep standards. I think it would sound much worse with a strong overpowering bassline.

1080p people.

Welp, it's better than 96kbs.

I approve, this is so good.